- The situation depicted by the case study is based on the profound and cultures that are presented. These dilemmas cut directly to the basics of the organization’s corporate culture, in this case, the General Parlelite Company GPC. The contracted writer explores old documents alongside corporate nostalgia within the company’s archives room. This painful discovery was information that the company’s namesake had been stolen from Hudson Parker’s fellow soldier and best college friend. The company’s CEO should act only after a solution to the problem is achieved. Burying the news would hardly be a good idea. The CEO needs to discuss the case with his superior, key management personnel and some of the founder’s family members, but he still has an idea of making the case public. This would be a good decision because the information could sneak out of their way thereby destroying the company’s reputation. The best decision would be to involve the people, whose names were used for the company’s namesake. The best option is that secures the organization.
In this case, the factual information that is hardly known in the case is that the person seems to be the actual founder of the company was not a hero but rather a deceiver. The founder had only deceived the company. Such actions were unlawful practices and upheld the company values.
The decision to act in favour of the organization’s safety would mainly affect the family member of the company founder. Mainly the family name and reputation would be destroyed. The ethical consideration in such decision is the conservation of a fair dealing culture within the organization. This should be the best decision even if it would imply that the founder’s family would have a bad reputation. Besides, it was a problem caused by their long gone grandparent.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH GRADE VALLEY TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT
