The Cherokee removal was an involuntary regulation application of the Native Americans and the Indians. The implementation of the regulations act was an attempt to establish an independent country that would otherwise dominate the Georgian City. The proceedings of the law were enacted by the legislature that proceeded over the extended jurisdiction, where Indian Cherokees demanded legal actions that would facilitate the functions of the petitioned Supreme Court of the United States of America. The populace of the Georgian region was undermined as domestic nations that were entirely regarded as a dependent and would not have survived a trail of effective government formation. The circumstances demanded a legal intervention that would establish the state and save the population from the wrath of isolation and a possibility of land alienation.
The formulations of the Worcester vs. Georgia cases were generally drafted as a federal protection scheme. This scheme incorporated an alienated structural policy for the Native Americans aimed to favour the Cherokee population, which was a composition of the Indian population. The success of the Cherokee removal was documentation devised after the appropriated planning for the segregation of the Native race of the American population. The mastermind of the entire schemes was President Andrew, who had a hand in the enactment of the Indian Removal Act and the enforcement of the same regulation. The Marshall’s decision was of no significance to the president’s game plan and this implied that the same would have been duly enforced on the Indian population of Cherokee.
The establishment of the treaties was a strategy to certify the federal government’s approach to the matter. The approach to seal the treaty occurred by the help of the Cherokee chiefs, who signed amendments. These chiefs complied with the rules of the land and inspired their subjects to do the same. This would effectively capture the Indian population occupying the land as this was a mandatory requirement. Through these protocols, the federal government would effectively control the native population and ensure that the citizens appreciate the set regulations. These regulations served the people through observing maximum respect to their rights and freedoms. Congress was widely used to activate the treaties signed by the Cherokee chiefs. This can be overviewed as a direct way to sabotage the functionality of the popular voice in a pattern to conquer the independent mind. The main objective of the plan was to declare victory of the removal of the Cherokee population from America despite the obstruction and overruled jurisdiction of the United States legislative systems.
Major barriers led to the removal of the Indian plan. There were challenges from the main populations who passionately fought to ensure that the laws clashed with the established treaties. The relationship between the Native Americans and Cherokee Indians led to the development of collaborated resistance of the entire federal government scheme. The Native Americans and the Indians murdered the three key chiefs, who signed the removal treaty in order to safeguard the interest of a larger population. The repercussions of the killings by the Natives and the Indians resulted in a massive retaliation by the Federal Government that pushed the populations into the West. . The land, which is presently referred to as the land of the trailed fears, became home to the Native Americans and Cherokee Indians.
The factors for the failure of the Cherokee nation can be traced back to a lack of a significant cooperation of the two involved governments. The forced resettlement of the Cherokee population to the west region of America was a great deviation of the nation’s population leading to a misunderstanding between the nations. The forced relocation impacted negatively on the current nation of America and has greatly eroded the American culture and identity of the minority population. The history of the removal of the Cherokee nation has also added to the negative treatment by other races within the American nation. This is due to the historical records that have been misinterpreted in the recent history and generation.
The illustration of the Cherokee nation has been absorbed as a practical example of discrimination and misinterpretation of the law by supreme bodies or individuals, who have a different opinion and generally discriminate against the less fortunate. The Cherokee removal was an involuntary regulation application of the Native Americans and the Indians. The implementation of the regulations act was an attempt to establish an independent country that would otherwise dominate the Georgian City. The analysis of the cases Worcester v. Georgia has been criticized over the last years, with description of the outcome possibilities that would have been alternatively approved to salvage the minority races that would have enabled a peaceful coexistence of different populations in America. This would have also created a simple American history that would have appreciated three different races and groups in the country.
Aaseng, Nathan. Cherokee Nation V. Georgia. San Diego, CA: Lucent Books, 2000.
Day, Charmaine L. Worcester V. Georgia: Cherokees, the American Board and the Nullification Crisis. 2006.
Gold, Susan. Worcester V. Georgia: Native American Rights. New York: Marshall Cavendish Benchmark, 2009.
 Susan, Gold. Worcester V. Georgia: Native American Rights. (New York: Marshall Cavendish Benchmark, 2009), 89.
 Nathan, Aaseng. Cherokee Nation V. Georgia. (San Diego, CA: Lucent Books, 2000, 18.
 Charmaine, Day, L. Worcester V. Georgia: Cherokees, the American Board and the Nullification Crisis. (2006), 55.
 Susan, Gold. Worcester V. Georgia: Native American Rights. (New York: Marshall Cavendish Benchmark, 2009), 98.
 Nathan, Aaseng. Cherokee Nation V. Georgia. (San Diego, CA: Lucent Books, 2000, 187.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH GRADE VALLEY TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT