The risks of regulating and accounting for health care provision
The emphasis that Payment by Result has altered the regulatory landscape within which hospitals work and that it has changed the risk associated with the provision of healthcare services might be overstressed. Though the governance and regulation of the accounting numbers was the dominant credo and norm that was to be aspired to, there were numerous factors affecting it. Even though the writer claims that at the process of endorsing patient choice, this left open the chance that one treatment kind could still be shown to be cheap as compared to others, but further statistics is not given. The claim that under the funding system, Pay by Result promised to pay providers transparently and fairly through the standard national tariff could have many defects. There was no authentication that the standard could fulfill all the requirements and so its defective. He further states that pay by Result created new spaces and risks as well. The extent to which Pay by Result created fresh calculating shelves though determined but all perspectives were never considered. The regulatory complex in which Pay by Result works may, as argued by the author, give contradicting incentives and therefore contributing to systematic provision risks. Though Pay by Result changed the way hospital workforce operated, this could be either positively or negatives though never specified by the author. The pay by Result method assisted the hospital to their financial management as well as, affected other areas though the positive impacts outweighed the negative as stated by the author. This claim must be true considering other factors and the result embedded.
Ki, L.& Miller, P. (2008). Counting the costs: The risks of regulating and accounting
for health care provision. London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH GRADE VALLEY TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT